Skip to main content
Beta
Use case · Investment search

Test an investment thesis before the target list hardens

When research starts from a loose theme, familiar firms crowd out better fits and nobody can trace why a target stayed in. Keep the thesis clauses, exact facts, judged reasons, source dates, firms, people, gaps and team decisions on one working record.

Company research, notes, spreadsheets, CRM files and deal records often split this context. Graph One’s gain is the joined working record; it does not claim to replace or integrate with those sources and systems.

Buyer-owned thesis brief · Local sample

IS–41 · Early company thesis review

Review owner · Maya Chen

01Decision
Which companies should advance to the team’s next thesis review, stay on hold or leave this target list?
02Target unit
One organisation record for a company. An asset, project, programme, fund, manager or issuer needs a different buyer-owned unit.
03Exact Graph One fields
Organisation type is Company · country is Germany, the Netherlands or Sweden · founded in or after 2018 · 20 to 250 employees.
04Buyer-owned field
Category: energy-operations software. The buyer supplies and owns this field; it is not shown as a built-in Search filter.
05Judged clauses
Available text names the target buyer and route to market · available role and company text supports the delivery model · required support is present.
06Exclusions
Wrong target unit or exact bounds · source outside the agreed scope · missing source or date. Missing judged support stays open; it is not filled by inference.
07Source scope
Shown Graph One organisation and role fields, buyer-owned fields and any source the buyer approves for this brief. Coverage and use still need review.
08Owner and review
Maya Chen · Investment analyst and owner · Priya Rao · investment reviewer · Jo Ellis · investment operations and source/access review · 22 August 2026 · all local sample roles

IS–41 is a local sample brief. It supplies no thesis fit, financial, valuation, ownership, performance, transaction, mandate, seller-interest or investment-outcome fact.

Investment settings

Change the unit before changing the thesis

SettingTarget unitNeeded fields
Company and technologyCompanyBuyer-owned category, product role and allowed commercial evidence
Asset and propertyAsset or portfolioBuyer-owned property, place, ownership and transaction fields
Project and materialsProject or assetBuyer-owned material, place, stage and technical-review fields
Programme and life sciencesProgramme or assetApproved scientific, rights and review fields supplied by the buyer
Controlled investment researchApproved entity or mandateApproved source, restriction and research-control fields

One company sample does not prove asset, project, programme, fund, manager, issuer or regulated-research work.

Exact Search · IS–41

Decide which company records enter the eligible pool

Use product fields only for hard bounds. The buyer-owned category and judged clauses do not become unsupported filters.

Loading IS–41 · Exact company boundary

Evaluative Search · IS–41

Judge clauses without creating an investment rank

Each reason names the shown source class, checked date and open gap. Missing support stays missing.

Loading IS–41 · Judged clause review

Reviewed target list · IS–41

One advances. One waits. One leaves this brief.

Priya Rao records the reviewed-list decision on 22 August 2026. The state directs more research; it is not an investment verdict, diligence approval or deal state.

  1. 01

    Harbour Grid

    Inside the shown exact bounds

    Advance to team review

    Judged reason
    Local sample company text names an energy-operations product, a commercial buyer and a route to market. Delivery scope remains unclear.
    Source and checked date
    Local sample Graph One organisation and role fields · checked 14 August 2026
    Open gap
    Delivery scope and source coverage
    Relevant person
    Sora Lind · Operations lead · role relevance needs review
    Available route
    Maya Chen → Sora Lind · available path context only
    Reviewer and owner
    Priya Rao · Investment director · local sample · Maya Chen · Investment analyst · local sample
    Next check
    Maya checks delivery scope and source coverage before any formal diligence hand-off.
  2. 02

    Northline Energy

    Inside the shown exact bounds

    Hold for source review

    Judged reason
    Local sample company text names a partner channel; the channel role and delivery model are not clear enough for this brief.
    Source and checked date
    Local sample Graph One organisation fields · checked 14 August 2026
    Open gap
    Partner-channel role and delivery model
    Relevant person
    Ari Vos · Partnerships lead · role relevance needs review
    Available route
    Not reviewed
    Reviewer and owner
    Priya Rao · Investment director · local sample · Owen Reed · Origination analyst · local sample
    Next check
    Owen checks an allowed source; the record stays visible meanwhile.
  3. 03

    Eider Systems

    Outside IS–41 · founded 2016

    Reject from IS–41

    Judged reason
    No judged thesis review was run because the local sample founded year fails the exact brief boundary.
    Source and checked date
    Local sample Graph One organisation field · checked 14 August 2026
    Open gap
    None for this brief; exact exclusion recorded
    Relevant person
    Not reviewed
    Available route
    Not reviewed
    Reviewer and owner
    Priya Rao · Investment director · local sample · Maya Chen · Investment analyst · local sample
    Next check
    Keep the exclusion reason and date; do not move it into this review.
Editorial view of one local sample across exact Search, evaluative Search, firm and person records, relationship paths, a Table, saved Views, comments and a Board. Human states explain what happens next; the investment team checks thesis fit, company quality and the final decision separately.

Firm record · Harbour Grid

Inspect the company behind the reviewed row

Open the identity, clause history, linked work and source limits behind the advance state.

H
Harbour Grid
Company under IS–41 review · Local sample

Advance to team review · Not an investment verdict

Organisation profile · Sample data

Target buyer and route
Supported in shown local sample text
Delivery model
Partial · delivery scope remains open
Reviewer
Priya Rao · local sample
Owner
Maya Chen · local sample
Current Graph One organisation identity and tabs · Local sample firm. No portfolio, ownership, funding, financial, valuation, performance or transaction fact is shown.Swipe the tab row or use its arrow keys to review each section.
S
Sora Lind
Operations lead · Harbour Grid · Local sample

Role relevance needs human review

Medium

Person profile · Sample data

Available role
Operations lead · local sample role field · 14 August 2026
Brief link
The role may help review the delivery-model clause; authority is not shown
Open check
Confirm role context and whether the source may be used for IS–41
Current Graph One person identity, relationship badge and tabs · Local sample. The investment team checks authority, interest, consent, availability and deal access beyond the role and path.Swipe the tab row or use its arrow keys to review each section.

Relevant person · Same firm

Keep people tied to the firm and the reason

The role may help review one thesis clause. It does not show authority, interest, consent or availability.

Route after company review

Review one possible route without claiming an introduction

Inspect available context on both legs only after the company and person merit more work. The team decides whether to ask.

No authority, availability, interest, consent, promised introduction or deal access

SL

Sora Lind

Operations lead · Harbour Grid · Local sample

Person profile · Sample data

SummaryNotesInteractionsMutual Connections

Whom could you ask?

Check the evidence on both legs before making the ask.

You Via Target
MC
Via

Maya Chen

Me – Via
Strong
Via – Target
Medium
Path context

Direct on both legs · Local sample

Available contact context

Meeting and email metadata · 6 August 2026

Shown relationship strength is evidence; Graph One does not choose whom to ask.Swipe the profile tab row to see every section. Compare both routes, then choose whom to ask

Table, Views and comments

Keep the firms, reasons, people and decisions in one working set

A saved View keeps source gaps in the same target list. Comments hold review context without making the Table a formal diligence record.

Loading the IS–41 reviewed target Table

Board · Human disposition

Make the target-list decision clear

Advance, hold and reject record the reviewed-list decision. They do not imply a deal, mandate, approval or investment result.

Same firms, owners and open gaps

Loading the IS–41 human disposition Board

Access

Keep review rights visible

Named person, team and folder access governs the shown Graph One work. It does not settle source rights or formal system access.

IS–41 human disposition Board

Board sharing · Sample data

3 access paths

People with access

Maya Chen

Owns this item

Owner

Investment review

Workspace share

Can edit

IS–41 target review

Shared folder

Can view
Real Graph One public-link control and access-source labels · Local sample data.

Graph One holds

Thesis brief, exact query, judged reasons, source notes, checked dates, firm and person links, route context, gaps, comments, Views, owners and reviewed-list state.

Buyer or approved source supplies

Category and setting-specific facts, source-use rules, exclusions, qualified reviewers and any formal investment or diligence material.

Buyer systems own

The authoritative deal or investment record, formal diligence, approvals, financial work, committee papers, legal and compliance records.

Hand-off record
IS–41 · Harbour Grid · advance to team review
Fields that survive
Reason, source class, checked date, gap, reviewer, owner and review date
Formal destination
Buyer’s investment, deal or research system · to agree
Method and owner
To agree in scope · Jo Ellis reviews source, access and destination · local sample operations/compliance role

This page does not claim a live integration, export, write-back, transaction workflow, formal diligence record or completed hand-off. The buyer and Graph One agree any destination, method, field map and access terms in scope.

One thesis · One exact meeting output

  1. 1 · Set the company or asset boundary
  2. 2 · Name the thesis clauses and exclusions
  3. 3 · Name the reviewer, owner and next system

Test a live thesis against firms, people and evidence

We will test its target unit, exact fields, source scope, judged clauses, people, available route, access and hand-off. The meeting returns one brief-and-field plan, one reviewed target-list format, one source-and-gap checklist and one formal hand-off record – not an investment verdict, diligence approval, integration, deal or outcome.